Accessability Links

Ah content, my old friend.

Oct 07 09 - 5:48PMNadia Owen, Business Communications Marketing
Yesterday marked the first edition of "Stylist" magazine. This is Shortlist Media's new women's magazine and operates under the same management team as the very popular Shortlist magazine. I'm sure you're all aware of Shortlist, as it has created quite a buzz since its launch in September 2007. As a woman of my mid-twenties, despite not being their target audience, I love reading this magazine. Sure I don't read everything man-related, but I find it to be highly entertaining (I dare say, laugh-out-loud funny) and their political articles carry some serious weight.

So imagine my excitement when I see that the same production team have come out with "Stylist". According to Marketing Magazine, Stylist is targeting "affluent 20 to 40-year-old female commuters."

Great, says I - I totally fit that bill.

stylist magazine cover edition oneThe doubt creeps into my mind when I see the cover picture of the magazine: Angelina "yes I'm pouting, just for something new and different" Jolie. Surely she's supposed to be on Shortlist's front page slash, any lads mag front page? Her face doesn't make me want to take this magazine. Anyway, that's just an aside.

I read the magazine, front to back. Every single page I read on my tube ride home. And then a little bit in the lounge room while eating my dinner. And I'm so angry! I'm like a cartoon animal with steam coming out of my ears!

The magazine is supposed to be progressive and interesting. Instead, it reads like a 1930s women's rights petition. Surely we have progressed from this? I'm all for female empowerment, but the magazine offended me greatly: classy articles such as "women spend 12 days a year getting ready for work" lead the way, followed by a tale of bra issues, and my personal favourite, their gender politics article. Ultimately, it portrayed its target audience as narrow-minded and antiquated. Great!

from the makers of shortlistI shared my opinion with several other women who fit the age requirement to read this glorious magazine and my thoughts were shared. We'd much rather read Shortlist than Stylist. What does that tell you about the target audience?

Moral of the story - always research your target audience before throwing disagreeable content at them. People buy into your brand, and they buy into what you have to say. So don't say stupid things. Otherwise you lose the trust and authority that you had worked so hard to build. Once bitten, twice shy.

Stylist
's website is yet to be active. They do however have an electronic version of the first magazine. I would appreciate your thoughts below. Personally, I'm biding my time to provide my feedback directly to their team. They issued the neighbouring picture on their holding page: Sorry it took so long to come out with such offensive content? I'm not!


Subscribe to comments of this blog Subscribe to comments of this blog

Liv, 07 October 2009, 11:06 PM
It boggles my MIND that in this social and economic climate, projects like this are getting off the ground. Tired, irrelevant content. Recycled stories, images, sentiments. You were right to baulk at the cover image - a file photo of Angelina Jolie? How dated is that? It says everything you need to know about the mag - they're out of touch and resting on the laurels created for them by other glossies - glossies women are very quickly getting sick of. I just think, there are so many smart, creative 'affluent female commuters in their 20s, 30s and 40s' who deserve better and I KNOW there are people out there without the budget this mag would have, trying to give it to them. May I suggest The Other Side magazine? It at least has something new to say, and in today's mainstream media age, that's a really pleasant surprise.
Add new comment