Accessability Links

Recruitment SEO: is it still relevant? The facts...

Jul 18 11 - 10:19AMAlex Charraudeau, Account Manager Marketing

Why is recruitment SEO still so important:

 - There are roughly 13 million people using the internet to look for a new job.  
        According to TMP
 - Over 70% of people are using Google and other search engines to look for jobs.  
        According to the NORAs
 - Over 50% of all job search queries will be skill-set or industry based and contain a location.
        According to Google UK

Recruitment SEO

It goes without saying that the more relevant candidates approaching you directly the more likely you are to make placements.  This is the main reason I believe SEO is still crucial to making recruitment agencies successful.  Despite this I have heard a number of people questioning the importance of recruitment search engine marketing.  The main reason for this is that recruitment social media has come along – because SEO is no longer the ONLY thing that matters...

Recruitment social media has exploded over the past few years.  Rightfully so as it is pretty awesome.  Nothing else allows you to engage so freely with passive and active candidates, prospective and existing clients and prospective and current staff. 

So why are people saying that recruitment SEO is dead and recruitment social media has taken over?  In the same way as when Google got big every man and their dog claimed to be a “Google Guru.”  The world is now full of “social media experts.”  They have deflected the importance of other marketing channels onto social because it is easier to sell.  It is harder to peddle something like SEO as so few can claim to have mastered it.

So is social replacing search?  The answer is simple.  No.  It is only an additional weapon in a recruiter's arsenal.

At the moment if you focus purely on social media you are missing out on the large volumes of candidates looking for you and your jobs directly from search engines.  As the stats above show over 70% of job seekers will start their journey with a Google search.  People you are engaging with on social media will be a combination of active and passive clients and candidates, whereas, people looking for you via a search engine are active job seekers or employers looking to either give you their CV or send you a job role right now.

These are the types of people who you can make money from in the short term and will continue to make money from in the future. 

Even in extremely niche markets there are still candidates looking for jobs via search engines.  If you would like to see case studies and examples please get in touch.  No matter what vertical market or skill set you recruit for this is still the case.

SEO has been proven to be one of the best sources of unique candidates for recruitment companies.  Alongside job boards SEO is probably the best channel to get active candidates and CVs.  SEO can also prove to be one of the cheapest forms of good quality CV acquisition.  It is hard to gain new clients through job boards, but much easier via search engines. 

Through targeted SEO you can help to filter the types of people coming to your website and as a result relieve the time spent on sifting out inappropriat applicants.  This makes recruiters' lives substantially easier when they know the CVs they are looking at are relevant.

For these reasons I believe that recruitment SEO is not dead. 

If you would like to know more about Recruitment SEO, social media marketing or any other types of recruitment marketing please get in touch.

Subscribe to comments of this blog Subscribe to comments of this blog

CanvasMan, 18 July 2011, 11:22 AM
For a lot of terms that people may search for e.g. 'catering jobs', they're likely to end up at a job board (or 'aggregator' like Indeed). These seem to have eaten up the top positions for every job term out there. Maybe SEO is dying for the recruiters while keeping jobs boards alive?
Alex, 18 July 2011, 11:05 AM
Great point! This is something we hear a lot. As it stands, recent changes to the way Google works means that aggregators are losing ground and you will see them coming up in fewer and fewer searches.

Job boards however still appear for a lot of shorter and broader search terms - such as "catering jobs". People are searching for these broad terms, but also searching for more specific skill set, sector and location based terms (stuff like "head waiter jobs South London"). For these types of phrases recruiters (with the right help) can rank and generate really relevant traffic.

That said, SEO shouldn't be measures purely on volume. It should be measured on the candidates / business it generates and the value it adds to your business.
CanvasMan, 18 July 2011, 12:31 PM
That makes sense, but what does 'recent changes' mean?
Alex, 18 July 2011, 01:27 PM
Sorry for not clarifying that - when I say recent changes I mean this:
Google has taken a new stance on the way it ranks duplicate content. Aggregators just take existing content and display it on their own site. This means that exactly the same jobs appear on your website and on the aggregator site. So as not to have the same information appearing within the search engine rankings several times Google is filtering out Aggregator sites so that they do not compete with the original content.
Stephen Turnock, 18 July 2011, 02:06 PM
Hi Alex, I cannot see a time yet when seo will become less relevant for recruitment so long as 70% of job searches start the journey at a search engine.

As passive and active candidates get more savvy at refining searches, they will increasingly want to interact with brands of signal and ones that engage right back - not just find a job landing page that is possibly not relevant or leading only to a one way (sometimes indirect) job application that they may not even hear back from.

So it’s increasingly about inbound attraction of the right seekers to the right recruiters and jobs - but also, signal and brand relevance in the rankings allow the seeker to know they have arrived at the right place.

Recruiters need to find ways to attract relevance over quantity and stand out as the ‘tall poppy’ over time. SEO, together with social, digital and mobile strategy are the enablers and early filters leading to inbound attracting more relevant, but less haystacks sooner ~ then we will have time to actually have a conversation and place someone!


No doubt lots of that traffic may not convert to any results of value for any party if the recruiter hasn’t got a Smartphone friendly landing page too!
Kent, 18 July 2011, 04:27 PM
SEO will never dead, but will evolve. SEO now has to work with social media marketing.
Phil Hutchinson-May, 20 July 2011, 03:47 PM
Alex
With reference to CanvasMan's comment that job boards are "eating up" top positions in SEO searches - that makes sense as they will have the highest ranking as they have more jobs and content. As a niche recruiter surely my mission is to appear as a leading recruiter on my industry sector job board rather than compete with the job board for direct traffic from Google.
What do you think?
Alex, 20 July 2011, 04:56 PM
Hi Phil, I agree that having a presence on the main job boards is important. But how many job boards are recruiters spending money on but not seeing a good return? The likelihood is that it is too many. If you can use recruitment SEO to cut back on the less effective ones surely that is a good thing.

Job boards mean you are recruiting from the same talent pool as your competitors so instead of being about providing a unique service to your clients it becomes about sending in the CVs off as fast as possible. Recruitment SEO works so well because it can deliver unique CVs from niche areas.

If you have to use job boards then I recommend writing search engine friendly job ads - this means candidates are more likely to find your jobs before applying with the competition.
Ivan @IrishRecruiter, 25 October 2011, 06:33 PM
Alex,

Duplicate content is what Google handles well for many years now (as opposed some recent update). The success of scrapers like Indeed is actually in the fact that they manage to present the content taken from another site as original content. That is why they manage to saturate the search results so much, since their page content always looks unique to Google, regardless that it is in fact taken from some other site.

Ivan
@IrishRecruieter
Alex, 26 October 2011, 08:19 AM
Hi Ivan,

Thanks for your comments. Taking what you have said into account, how would you explain the fact that those sites no longer rank as highly as they did 6-12 months ago?
Add new comment
Enter code